HomePage

Relational Quantum Gravity : QEDSub

MainIndex :: Login

Locality of Dirac Field Operators


Theorem:  The equal time anticommutation relations for the Dirac field and Dirac adjoint and obey:
QED-12

Proof:  Using the identity (true in a particular basis, so true in any basis),
QED-13
and (from the solution of the Dirac Equation)
QED-14
we find that
QED-15
QED-16
QED-17
QED-18

Similarly,
QED-19

We have
QED-20
where T denotes that α and β are transposed. Using the resolution of unity and the solution of the Dirac equation,
QED-21
QED-22
Likewise for the antiparticle,
QED-23
QED-24
Substituting p → −p at x0 = y0
QED-26
Adding at x0 = y0 gives the equal time anticommutator,
QED-27
As required.

Theorem:  The anticommutation relation for the Dirac field and the Dirac adjoint is zero outside the light cone.

Proof:  From the above formulae,
QED-28
and
QED-29
The anticommutator is found by adding
QED-30
QED-31
using the generalised scaling property of the delta function applied to the mass shell condition. The integral is Lorentz invariant and is zero when x0 − y0 = 0. We conclude that it is zero whenever x − y is spacelike.

Return

Conserved Current


Theorem:  QED-101 is a classical conserved current density,
QED-102

Lemma:  The equal time commutator of charge with the Hamiltonian density is zero,
QED-95


Proof of Lemma:
QED-96
Take the Hermitian conjugate and postmultiply by γ0,
QED-97
So, by commuting the terms,
QED-98
QED-99
QED-100

Proof of theorem:  We have, from Ehrenfest’s theorem, that the expectation of the current density obeys
QED-103.
The first term is zero by the lemma. From the solution of the Dirac equation, we have that
QED-105
Taking the Hermitian conjugate, post multiplying by γ0, and using the conjugacy relation, γ0γaγ0 = γa gives
QED-106
Similarly
QED-107
and
QED-108
Current density is given by
QED-104
Normal ordering transposes the creation and annihilation operators, but not the spin indices. Expanding the creation and annihilation operators in terms of momentum and differentiating the particle term gives,
QED-109
QED-110
The other terms are found to be zero in the same way.

Return

Maxwell’s Equation’s


Proof:  We have,
Maxwell’s equations  CEM-76
Lorenz gauge  CEM-77
Faraday tensor  CEM-78
Hence,
CEM-79
CEM-80

The first term gives the electrostatic equation
CEM-81
The last three terms give
CEM-82
CEM-83
CEM-84
These equations are summarised in the Ampère-Maxwell law
CEM-85

From the definition of the Faraday tensor,
CEM-86
we have the identity,
CEM-87
abc = 0, 2, 3 gives
CEM-88
abc = 0, 3, 1 gives
CEM-89
abc = 0, 1, 2 gives
CEM-90
These three equations are summarised in Faraday’s law,
CEM-91
abc = 1, 2, 3 gives the magnetostatic law,
CEM-92
Thus, in a treatment based on CEM-93 the magnetic laws are mathematical identities, not physical laws.

Return

There are no comments on this page. [Add comment]

Valid XHTML 1.0 Transitional :: Valid CSS :: Powered by WikkaWiki
Page was generated in 0.1679 seconds